The Compromise That Gave Congress Two Chambers
In the summer of 1787, delegates from the states met in Philadelphia to design a new national government. They agreed that Congress should make the laws, but they quickly ran into a hard question: how should each state be represented? The states with the most people argued that they should have more votes, because they would be affected by the laws the most. The smaller states feared that they would be outvoted every time and would have no real voice.
The disagreement lasted for weeks, and some delegates worried that the meeting would fail. Eventually a committee worked out an answer that gave each side something it wanted. Congress would have two chambers. In the House of Representatives, each state would have a number of seats based on its population, so larger states would have more members. In the Senate, every state would have two members, no matter how large or small it was.
This plan is often called the Connecticut Compromise, because delegates from that state were among those who helped to shape it. Under the plan, a bill must pass both the House and the Senate before it can become a law. A large state cannot ignore the small ones, and a group of small states cannot ignore the large ones.
Nobody got everything. The result was a design in which neither side had total control, and that made both willing to accept the Constitution. Compromise is not always a sign of weakness. In this case, it made a lasting government possible.