The Blue That Once Cost More Than Gold
Look closely at the robes in many paintings from the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, and you may spot a deep, rich blue. That color was often ultramarine, and for a long time it was one of the most precious materials an artist could buy. Its name means "beyond the sea," because the raw material was carried by traders from far-off mines in Afghanistan.
The source was a bright blue stone called lapis lazuli. Turning the stone into paint was a long and difficult process. The stone had to be ground into powder and mixed with wax, resin and oils into a soft dough. This dough was then kneaded in a liquid solution, which slowly washed the pure blue particles out of the gray and white bits of rock. The finest blue came out first, and later batches were paler and less costly.
Because the work was so demanding and the stone so scarce, the paint sometimes cost more than the value of the gold used on the same artwork. Patrons who ordered a painting often listed the exact amount of ultramarine in their contracts. Artists saved it for the most important subjects, and they used cheaper blues for the sky and background.
Everything changed in the early nineteenth century, when chemists found a way to make a similar pigment in a laboratory. Synthetic ultramarine was far cheaper, and it let painters use brilliant blue freely. Today the same color is sold in many tubes of paint, and few people realize that it once came from a journey across mountains and seas.