Skip to the content

Meta-Analyses of the Effects of Tier 2 Type Reading Interventions in Grades K-3

Jeanne Wanzek, Sharon Vaughn, Nancy Scammacca, Brandy Gatlin, Melodee A. Walker, Philip Capin2016Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576

We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.

What it found

Small-group and individual reading interventions of the kind schools use in tier 2 improved foundational reading skills and, by less, language and comprehension, for young students with or at risk for reading difficulties. Effects didn't differ by type of intervention, group size, grade, who delivered it or the number of hours.

Effect size, as the source reports it: mean ES = 0.54 on standardized foundational skill measures; 0.36 on standardized language and comprehension measures.

What kind of study it is

Design
Meta-analysis
Weight
A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
Sample
72 studies of less extensive reading interventions for students in grades K–3 with or at risk for reading difficulties
Who
School-age children (K–12)

Read it

doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7 · ERIC record EJ1110194

We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.

Cited in the Library

Cite this study

Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of tier 2 type reading interventions in grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7

Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.