Skip to the content

Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures

Cary J. Roseth, David W. Johnson, Roger T. Johnson2008Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246

We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.

What it found

Classes where students worked toward shared goals were linked to higher achievement and better peer relationships than classes where students competed or worked alone, and achievement and good relationships went together under cooperative goals.

What kind of study it is

Design
Meta-analysis
Weight
A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
Sample
148 studies of over 17,000 early adolescents in 11 countries
Who
School-age children (K–12)
Limits
The review tests predictions of social interdependence theory, which two of its authors have written about at length (Johnson & Johnson, 2009). The studies span eight decades.

Read it

doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223 · ERIC record EJ787692

We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.

Cited in the Library

Cite this study

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223

Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.