Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham—Based Reading Instruction
We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.
What it found
Of twelve studies, five found Orton-Gillingham instruction better on every outcome measured, four on some outcomes, two found the comparison instruction better, and one found no difference. Given how few studies there were, their lack of rigor and the inconclusive results, the authors concluded more research is needed before a scientific basis can be established.
What kind of study it is
- Design
- Review
- Weight
- Adds context: a review or a weaker design, which doesn't move a card's rating on its own.
- Sample
- 12 experimental or quasi-experimental studies with elementary, adolescent and college students
Read it
doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030501
We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.
Cited in the Library
Cite this study
Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham—based reading instruction. The Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669060400030501
Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.