Skip to the content

Mozart effect–Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis

Jakob Pietschnig, Martin Voracek, Anton K. Formann2010Intelligence, 38(3), 314–323

We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.

What it found

Listening to the Mozart sonata before a spatial task gave a small, short-lived boost compared with silence, but other music did about as well, and the difference between Mozart and other music was negligible. There was evidence of publication bias, and the effect was noticeably larger in studies by the original research group. Little evidence remains for a specific Mozart effect.

Effect size, as the source reports it: Mozart vs silence or a non-music stimulus d = 0.37; other music vs silence d = 0.38; Mozart vs other music d = 0.15.

What kind of study it is

Design
Meta-analysis
Weight
A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
Sample
Nearly 40 studies, over 3,000 participants, including unpublished research

Read it

doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.03.001 · ERIC record EJ882611

We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.

Cited in the Library

Cite this study

Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M., & Formann, A. K. (2010). Mozart effect–Shmozart effect: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 38(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.03.001

Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.