Skip to the content

Learning Styles

Harold Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer, Robert Bjork2008Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119

We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.

What it found

Reviewing the research on learning styles, the authors found plenty of evidence that people state preferences for how information is presented, but virtually no evidence for the "meshing" pattern (teaching that matches a learner's style producing better learning) that would justify learning-styles teaching. Very few studies used a design able to test it, and several that did contradicted it.

What kind of study it is

Design
Review
Weight
Adds context: a review or a weaker design, which doesn't move a card's rating on its own.
Limits
A review that set out what evidence would be needed; it notes that not every version of learning styles has been tested.

Read it

doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.

Cited in the Library

Cite this study

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x

Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.