The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory
We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.
What it found
Feedback improved performance on average, but more than a third of feedback interventions made performance worse. Feedback worked less well the more it drew attention away from the task and toward the person.
Effect size, as the source reports it: d = .41 on average; over a third of feedback interventions decreased performance.
What kind of study it is
- Design
- Meta-analysis
- Weight
- A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
- Sample
- 607 effect sizes, 23,663 observations
- Limits
- Covers feedback in many settings, not only schools.
Read it
doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.
Cited in the Library
Cite this study
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.