Skip to the content

Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques

John Dunlosky, Katherine A. Rawson, Elizabeth J. Marsh, Mitchell J. Nathan, Daniel T. Willingham2013Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58

We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.

What it found

Of ten common study techniques, practice testing and spreading study out over time (distributed practice) were rated high utility, because they helped learners of different ages and abilities on many kinds of test, including in real classes. Elaborative interrogation, self-explanation and interleaved practice were rated moderate. Summarizing, highlighting, the keyword mnemonic, imagery for text and rereading were rated low.

What kind of study it is

Design
Review
Weight
Adds context: a review or a weaker design, which doesn't move a card's rating on its own.
Sample
Ten study techniques, each reviewed across learners of different ages, materials and tests
Who
Both school-age children and college students
Limits
A careful narrative review with ratings by the authors, not a pooled meta-analysis.

Read it

doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.

Cited in the Library

Cite this study

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.