Meta-Analysis of Mathematic Basic-Fact Fluency Interventions: A Component Analysis
We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.
What it found
Among math fact fluency interventions, drill and practice combined with modeling produced the largest effects. Interventions with more than three components did better than those with fewer, and involving more than one person in delivering them led to better outcomes.
What kind of study it is
- Design
- Meta-analysis
- Weight
- A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
- Sample
- 17 single-case design studies with 55 participants
- Limits
- Pools small single-case studies; useful for what works in intervention, less so for whole classes.
Read it
doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x
We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.
Cited in the Library
Cite this study
Codding, R. S., Burns, M. K., & Lukito, G. (2011). Meta-analysis of mathematic basic-fact fluency interventions: A component analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2010.00323.x
Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.