Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: a Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms
We checked this card's citation and the finding we state against the source's own page or record in October 2026.
What it found
Counting only experiments run in real classes, retrieval practice improved learning across education levels, subjects, test formats and delays, and 57% of the effect sizes were medium or large. Only 6% of the experiments were run outside Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic countries.
What kind of study it is
- Design
- Systematic review
- Weight
- A synthesis: it pools or weighs many studies, so it carries the most weight on the evidence meter.
- Sample
- 50 classroom experiments, 49 effect sizes, 5,374 students, from nearly 2,000 abstracts screened
- Who
- Both school-age children and college students
- Limits
- Mixes school and college classes. Most experiments come from a narrow set of countries.
Read it
doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9 · ERIC record EJ1319572
We link to the source and summarize it in our own words. We don't host or copy papers.
Cited in the Library
Cite this study
Agarwal, P. K., Nunes, L. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2021). Retrieval practice consistently benefits student learning: A systematic review of applied research in schools and classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1409–1453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9
Checked against the source in October 2026. All studies · How we rate the evidence · Something wrong? Tell us.